Sunday, 7 November 2021
Why did Nate Saint go to Ecuador?
Wednesday, 8 September 2021
Why? Because Jesus only had to die once.
When the children of Israel were living in the wilderness they were subject to many trials and afflictions, one of them being a lack of water and, in the book of Exodus, chapter 17, we read of such an incident. In answer to this God commanded Moses to strike a rock and water came out to satisfy their thirst.
In Numbers chapter 20 the Israelites are, again, without water, but on this occasion God commanded Moses not to strike the rock but to speak to it. However, in a rare display of blatant disobedience he struck the rock. For this offence he was debarred from entering the promised land (and also, no doubt, for his arrogance in stating "must we fetch you water out of this rock" - verse 10).
While we can understand God's displeasure with Moses the question remains - why did He tell Moses to strike the rock in Exodus 17 but to speak to it in Numbers 20?
It is an intriguing question and one that has perplexed many, but the answer is really very simple - because Jesus only had to die once.
Let's apply some Typology to this.
In 1st Corinthians 10 we read that when the Israelites were in the wilderness the Rock was Christ; we also know from both the Old and New Testaments that water is a symbol of spiritual cleansing- the refences are too numerous to mention here.. Moreover, the image of striking is a picture of Christ's death. In Isaiah 53 we read that Jesus was "...stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted" - verse 4. Therefore, it is not delving in the realms of fantasy to believe that the incident in Exodus 17 is a vivid picture of Christ being struck for us, and through His death we have spiritual cleansing; BUT, according to Hebrews 9 v 28, and also 10 v 12, Christ was to die "once". On the second occasion Moses should have spoken to the rock which is a picture of what we read in Romans 10 v 13 viz. "whoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved".
We see, all too clearly, a profound spiritual lesson; due to Christ's death, and subsequent resurrection, the way for us to obtain spiritual cleansing, and a right standing before God, is open to all. We cannot add to that finished work. Down through the centuries huge numbers of people have sought to add to the work of Christ by their own good works and religious observances. Moreover, the Roman Catholics believe that it is possible to re-sacrifice His sacrifice which, they claim, happens during the Mass.
However, as we see from the above description of these two separate incidents, our dear Saviour only had to suffer once - the response required from us is not to add to this work, by own own efforts, but simply to call upon the Lord's name and we "will be saved".
Whoever calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved".
Monday, 21 June 2021
My first big test and how I coped with it.
Wednesday, 21 April 2021
Evangelistic lessons from Ecclesiastes 11.
Wednesday, 17 March 2021
They just don't get it.
Wednesday, 17 February 2021
Why is universalism so wrong?
During the Christmas period I received a rather bizarre email from a person, who I had previously thought to be a genuine Christian. The missive went something this: "I have become a Universalist Christan; I believe that everyone gets to Heaven in the end".
After giving this some thought I felt compelled to email him a reply to the effect that he needs to repent of this heresy and come back to God's Word.
Why did I take such a strong stance on this matter and act with, what some may term, "an undue harshness"? Why is universalism so heretical, so utterly wicked, that those who hold to this view need to be warned, in no uncertain terms, to repent and turn to God's Word?
The answer is simple - Universalism contradicts the clear teaching of Christ in four ways; moreover, it violates the principle of natural justice. Let's look at these:
Firstly, universalism is wrong because Christ taught that there are two ways and two destinations
In Matthew 7 verses 13-14, He stated that there is a Broad Way and a Narrow Way. Most people, sadly, travel this Broad Way in life and it ends in judgement.
Secondly, universalism is wrong because Christ gave us stern warnings of a place called Hell.
In Mark chapter 9 He clearly warned us of a dreadful place, "where their worm dies not and the fire is not quenched" see verses 44 and 48.
Thirdly, universalism is wrong because Christ told us that He is the only way "to the Father"
In John 14 v 6 He declared Himself the only way to be right with God, the Father. Moreover, John chapter 3 v 18 states that people who do not believe in Christ are under condemnation.
Fourthly, universalism is wrong because it contradicts the great commission
In Mark 16 v 15 Christ told us to go out "into all the world and preach the Gospel". If everyone gets to Heaven in the end what would be the point of spreading the Gospel? Why put ourselves at risk of ridicule, and even danger, if everyone is going to Heaven, anyway?
Finally, universalism is wrong because it militates against our natural sense of justice.
In March 1996, one Thomas Hamilton walked into a primary school in Dunblane, murdered 16 children and their teacher, then shot himself dead. According to universalists he is in Heaven. Such a thought simply does not "ring true". Even without the Bible's teaching on this matter, we know that this vile teaching, that everyone gets to Heaven in the end, is a ludicrous invention.
What should be our response to all this? Simply to re-double our efforts to spread the Gospel because, if the Bible is true (and it is), there is only one way to Heaven - and we need to tell people how to get there.
Tuesday, 15 December 2020
The Gospel begets racial equality.
We've heard a lot, in recent months about the issue of racial equality and the need to treat everyone fairly, regardless of skin colour and, I've no doubt, that all right minded people would unreservedly agree.
However, it is my belief that true racial equality comes about in the presentation of the Christian Gospel and I would like to give 4 reasons for this assertion.
Firstly, in Romans 3 verses 10 and 23 we are told that all people are sinful in the sight of a Holy God who has perfection as His standard. We have all fallen short of that perfection, irrespective of skin colour. We are all, by nature, under God's condemnation and deserve His wrath throughout eternity.
Secondly, Hebrews 2 v 9 tells us that Christ tasted death "for everyone". Again, skin colour makes no difference when it comes to the objects of God's love, as shown in Christ. He loves "the World" (John 3 v 16) and His Son is the propitiation "for the sins of the whole world" 1st John 2 v 1-2.
Thirdly, Revelation 5 v 9 and 7 v 9 tells us that in Heaven there will be people from every "kindred, tongue, people and nation". This doesn't, of course, mean that everyone will be in Heaven, but all people who have accepted Christ as their personal Saviour, regardless of where they come from, or what language they speak, will be worshipping the Saviour.
And, finally, (in the words of Trevor McDonald!) Acts 17 v 26 tells us that God "has made of one blood, all nations of men for to dwell on the face of the earth". In a sense, it could be argued that there is no such thing as different races; rather, there is the human race.
While it is true, that people have misused the Bible to justify racism (for example the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa, in its past support for apartheid), as true Christians, born-again of the Holy Spirit, we can confidently stand with God's infallible word and stand against racism in the best way possible viz. by dedicating ourselves to the spread of the only message that will save people from their sins.