They just don't get it.

There's been a lot of talk in political circles, lately, about possible plans to make "gay conversion therapy" illegal, thus protecting homosexuals from "psychological manipulation and quack remedies, designed to make them normal".

Now, I've no wish to "psychologically manipulate" anyone; my only desire is to spread the Gospel to the end that people would be saved from their sins and have eternal life.  However, it's come to my attention  that some MPs wish to go further; they want to make it illegal to pray with gays, and counsel them from the Bible.  This would have the effect of criminalising such verses as 1st Cor. 6 v 9-11, or even 2nd Cor. 5 v 17.

As I thought upon this, my mind was drawn to the words of Jesus in John 3 v 8 when He declared that "the wind blows where it wishes...…..so is everyone who is born of the Spirit".  If the Holy Spirit deigns to blow into a persons life and convert them to Christ, then no power on earth can stop Him.

Indeed, one of the great teachings of God's word is that of effectual calling.  We are told in Acts 13 v 48, when Paul was preaching in Pisidian Antioch, that "as many as were ordained to eternal life believed".  Moreover, we are told, by Jesus Himself, that everyone given to Him by the Father, will come to Him (John 6 v 37).  These, and many other verses give us complete confidence that, when we spread the Gospel, either by word, or the printed page, then God will draw His elect to repentance, and faith in Christ.  Moreover, we are told in Job 42 v 2 that God's purposes "cannot be thwarted".  People may be thwarted in their aspirations and, indeed, often are, but God will always ensure that His decrees are carried out. No-one, no matter how "powerful", in the world's eyes, will be able to stop the Holy Spirit working in the lives of those who have been appointed to eternal life.

This brings me to the title of this article - those MPs and "gay rights" groups, who wish to make it illegal for the Bible to be used in converting people, are fighting against God, and they are fighting a losing battle. 

In conclusion, it seems that the most appropriate passage to quote, at this juncture, would be Psalm 2 viz. "Why do the heathen rage, and the people image a vain thing, the kings of the earth set themselves...… against the LORD....He that sits in the Heavens shall laugh".

Why is universalism so wrong?

During the Christmas period I received a rather bizarre email from a person, who I had previously thought to be a genuine Christian. The missive went something this: "I have become a Universalist Christan; I believe that everyone gets to Heaven in the end".

After giving this some thought I felt compelled to email him a reply to the effect that he needs to repent of this heresy and come back to God's Word. 

Why did I take such a strong stance on this matter and act with, what some may term, "an undue harshness"?  Why is universalism so heretical, so utterly wicked, that those who hold to this view need to be warned, in no uncertain terms, to repent and turn to God's Word? 

The answer is simple - Universalism contradicts the clear teaching of Christ in four ways; moreover, it violates the principle of natural justice.  Let's look at these:

Firstly, universalism is wrong because Christ taught that there are two ways and two destinations

In Matthew 7 verses 13-14, He stated that there is a Broad Way and a Narrow Way.  Most people, sadly, travel this Broad Way in life and it ends in judgement.

Secondly, universalism is wrong because Christ gave us stern warnings of a place called Hell.

In Mark chapter 9 He clearly warned us of a dreadful place, "where their worm dies not and the fire is not quenched" see verses 44 and 48.

Thirdly, universalism is wrong because Christ told us that He is the only way "to the Father"

In John 14 v 6 He declared Himself the only way to be right with God, the Father.  Moreover, John chapter 3 v 18 states that people who do not believe in Christ are under condemnation.

Fourthly, universalism is wrong because it contradicts the great commission

In Mark 16 v 15 Christ told us to go out "into all the world and preach the Gospel".  If everyone gets to Heaven in the end what would be the point of spreading the Gospel?  Why put ourselves at risk of ridicule, and even danger, if everyone is going to Heaven, anyway?

Finally, universalism is wrong because it militates against our natural sense of justice.

In March 1996, one Thomas Hamilton walked into a primary school in Dunblane, murdered 16 children and their teacher, then shot himself dead.  According to universalists he is in Heaven.  Such a thought simply does not "ring true".  Even without the Bible's teaching on this matter, we know that this vile teaching, that everyone gets to Heaven in the end, is a ludicrous invention.

What should be our response to all this?  Simply to re-double our efforts to spread the Gospel because, if the Bible is true (and it is), there is only one way to Heaven - and we need to tell people how to get there.

 

 

The Gospel begets racial equality.

We've heard a lot, in recent months about the issue of racial equality and the need to treat everyone fairly, regardless of skin colour and, I've no doubt, that all right minded people would unreservedly agree.

However, it is my belief  that true racial equality comes about in the presentation of the Christian Gospel and I would like to give 4 reasons for this assertion.

Firstly, in Romans 3 verses 10 and 23 we are told that all people are sinful in the sight of a Holy God who has perfection as His standard.  We have all fallen short of that perfection, irrespective of skin colour.  We are all, by nature, under God's condemnation and deserve His wrath throughout eternity.

Secondly, Hebrews 2 v 9 tells us that Christ tasted death "for everyone".  Again, skin colour makes no difference when it comes to the objects of God's love, as shown in Christ.  He loves "the World" (John 3 v 16) and His Son is the propitiation "for the sins of the whole world" 1st John 2 v 1-2.  

Thirdly, Revelation 5 v 9 and 7 v 9 tells us that in Heaven there will be people from every "kindred, tongue, people and nation".  This doesn't, of course, mean that everyone will be in Heaven, but all people who have accepted Christ as their personal Saviour, regardless of where they come from, or what language they speak, will be worshipping the Saviour.

And, finally, (in the words of Trevor McDonald!) Acts 17 v 26 tells us that God "has made of one blood, all nations of men for to dwell on the face of the earth".  In a sense, it could be argued that there is no such thing as different races; rather, there is the human race.

While it is true, that people have misused the Bible to justify racism (for example the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa, in its past support for apartheid), as true Christians, born-again of the Holy Spirit, we can confidently stand with God's infallible word and stand against racism in the best way possible viz. by dedicating ourselves to the spread of the only message that will save people from their sins.

Can such a man as this get saved?

News has come through of the death of Peter Sutcliffe AKA "The Yorkshire Ripper".  He was serving a whole life sentence for a series of horrific murders of many women over a period of several years in the Yorkshire area during the 1970s and 1980s.

Upon hearing of his death it is likely that there will be people making the following comment "Well, if anyone deserves Hell, it's him, no doubt he is there now". Is such an observation justified?

Firstly, let's look at the question -who deserves God's judgement in Hell?  The quick answer would be people like Sutcliffe, child killers, war criminals and so on.   However, if we are true to the Bible we need to acknowledge that we all deserve Hell.  We've all sinned in God's sight and deserve His just condemnation; Romans 3 v 10 and v 23 make this abundantly clear.  Moreover, if we look into our own hearts and see just how sinful our thought lives can be we know that we deserve God's condemnation.

Secondly, before we assume that all killers deserve Hell, but not the rest of us, let us remember the teachings of Christ that to hate someone is to murder them in our hearts - is any of us able to be acquitted of such a deed?

Thirdly, the Bible teaches that Christ's death was a sacrifice for the sins of all mankind - 1st John 2 v 2.  In that sense we all participated in the grisly events that surrounded His crucifixion.  We were all part of the crowd that howled for His blood, we all sat in Pilate's seat condemning Him, we all nailed Him to the cross and jeered at Him even while He bore our sins - in short we all have the blood of the Son of God on our hands.

Fourthly, God's grace is such that even convicted murderers can be forgiven, and given a place in Heaven, if they truly turn to Christ and receive Him as their personal Saviour.  I have heard accounts of people in prison for the most horrendous offences, being wonderfully converted.  Moreover, it is quite possible, that Sutcliffe turned to Christ before he died; we don't know this for sure but while that possibility remains we cannot say definitively that he is in Hell.

As I pondered the possibility of Sutcliffe turning to Christ before dying I'm reminded of the following that I heard a few years ago from a good friend of mine, a Christian evangelist who likes nothing better than to preach the wonderful Gospel of God's grace.  It goes like this.....

In a particular area there was a notorious atheist who openly  rejected the Gospel and would have nothing to do with the Bible.   One day he was thrown from a horse and  knocked unconscious. While he was still unconscious and hovering between life and death Christians prayed for him that he would wake up and have another opportunity to be saved.  In God's merciful providence he did recover and stated the following "you all thought that if I'd died I would have gone to Hell, but what you don't realise is that as I was flying through the air I turned to Christ and believed in Him just before hitting the ground."   Contrary to popular belief he would not have died in his sins.  This led to one penning the following words: 

"Between the saddle and the ground, mercy was sought and mercy found"

Is Peter Sutcliffe in Heaven or Hell? We don't know - but I suspect there will be surprises in Heaven!

Steve Chalke, the latter day Charles Templeton

The reason for this blog is simply to proclaim Gospel truths, and not to engage in personal "attacks" on individuals.  However, the situation with Steve Chalke's apostasy has now become so serious it ill-behoves me, or anybody else who cares for truth, to ignore the damage he is doing.

Before we come to Chalke, however, it would be worth looking at another apostate - Charles Templeton, as there is a common thread that unites both people.

Templeton was born in 1915 and, during the 1940s, he was a close colleague of Billy Graham; indeed, they preached together under the auspices of Youth For Christ.  Moreover, being Graham's senior by 3 years he seemed, for a while, to be the more prominent of the two.  Many young people professed to be converted under Templeton's ministry and he appeared to have God's blessing upon him.  However, by the time the 1950s came along he acknowledged an unwillingness to accept a literal interpretation of Genesis and, to cut a long story short, he finally admitted, during that decade, that he had renounced the Christian faith.  His eternal fate seemed to be sealed when he published the book "Farewell to God" just a short while before his death.

Steve Chalke, born 40 years later, professed conversion in his youth and soon began to engage in Gospel work, having a particular appeal to young people.  Indeed, shortly after my own conversion to Christ, in 1975, he would sometimes visit the church I was attending, and I greatly appreciated his clear, Bible based ministry.  I lost touch with him by the end of the 1970s but would sometimes read the odd article he had written in the Christian press.

About 18 years ago, he ridiculed the Biblical teaching of a  6-day creation, labelling it "rubbish".  Had he disagreed with the literal interpretation of Genesis but showed respect to people who held to it, that would have been bad enough; but his arrogant contempt for those who held to this truth led me to the view that he was heading for a fall.

A few years later, he moved further away from the truth by denying that Christ had borne the wrath of God upon the cross (this essential truth is referred to as "propitiation" in Scripture) and denounced it as "cosmic child abuse".  Given that penal substitution, as it is dubbed  by theologians, is an integral part of the Gospel it was obvious that Chalke was on a seriously downward path away from the Bible.  As time passed he made it clear he rejected the concept of Biblical infallibility and, as if that wasn't bad enough, he came out strongly against the Biblical teaching on marriage and sexuality, siding with enemies of the Christian faith who were promoting unnatural perversions.

Further, he has made clear his willingness to bless so-called "gay unions" and his church, as far as I am aware, endorses "gay marriage".  His apostasy is now so complete, he has openly called for "government intervention" to deal with sermons that he deems to be "negative" on this issue.  In short, he wants to criminalise the Bible's teaching on this matter.

Given that both Templeton and Chalke started their downgrade when they moved away from Genesis there is this common thread that runs through both.  This is a clear warning to us, not to meddle with the first book in the Bible because, once we do that, we may well find ourselves moving further away from truth as we read through God's word.

Finally, it should be stated, that although both of these apostates are on the wrong side of God's truth, there is a sense in which Chalke is the more dangerous of the two.   To be fair to Templeton, at least he had a shred of integrity about him when he admitted to having renounced the faith so that we all knew where he stood, and where we stood with him.  Chalke, despite militating against God's word, still claims to be a Christian, and a minister, at that.  As a result of his endorsing "gay marriage" he is confirming people in their sin; if he wishes to damn his own soul, that is his lookout, but by supporting unnatural perversions he is damning the souls of all the poor creatures who are unfortunate enough to fall for his pernicious wiles.  In short, he will have their blood on his hands when they end up in Hell along with him. 

In conclusion it should be stated, that this dreadful state of affairs should not surprise us; after all,  Paul warn us that "some would depart from the faith..." - 1st Timothy 4 v 1; we are also told that there would be a "falling away" before Christ's return - 2nd Thess. 2 v 3.

May God give us grace not to fall in with the spirit of the age but to remain firm and steadfast, no matter how strong the temptation to throw in the towel and throw in our lot with the likes of Steve Chalke.

The real freethinkers

Given that it's been a few months since my last blog article I thought it was high time I put pen to paper and wrote about a matter that has been on my mind recently (and, no, it's not this virus business!).

During the 19th century this country was outwardly Christian, at least in a cultural manner.  Most people regularly attended church services (though I suspect that many were simply wearing the name "Christian" as a badge, without being truly born again of the Holy Spirit) and the laws of this country did not permit many of the unnatural perversions and other acts of wickedness which are prevalent today.   It was even the case that atheists were not allowed to stand for parliament. 

Against this backdrop a group of people emerged calling themselves "freethinkers".   They were strongly humanistic, even atheistic, and strenuously opposed the way that this country's laws and culture sought to conform to the Bible.

We all know that over the last century, and certainly, since the end of the 2nd World War, the culture and laws of the UK have moved well away from the teachings of the Bible and we are now living in a country which is not only post-Christian, but anti-Christian, with persecution being real for true Christians who seek to live by God's infallible word. 

Given the dire spiritual state of the nation, it intrigues me that there are still people around calling themselves freethinkers because of their atheistic humanism.  These poor creatures are 150 years out of date!  Why do I say that?  Simply because the true definition of a freethinker is one who is prepared to have views and beliefs that do not conform to the majority of the population.  Given that most people do not accept the Bible as God's word, the term "freethinker" is redundant as far as humanists are concerned.

Who, then, are the real freethinkers?  Again, using the correct definition of the term - the freethinkers of today are believers in Christ, who hold to the Bible as absolutely true and reject much of the thinking and behaviour of the majority of the population.

The real freethinkers of today stand firm for God's word and refuse to conform to the wickedness prevalent in this benighted country.  We stand against the unnatural perversions, the filth, the infanticide and the hedonism of the masses.  We have the courage to swim against the tide and are prepared to endure hardships and persecution for daring to challenge the extreme "political correctness" that pervades modern society.

In short the true freethinkers of the UK in 2020 are the ones who walk the narrow way as outlined in the words of our Saviour in Matthew 7 v 13-14.

In office, but not in power.

In recent months the news has been dominated by the C-Virus with people having an almost ghoulish obsession with the daily announcements of deaths and the rate of infection.   Moreover, the daily round of press conferences  by govt, minsters, most notably the Health Secretary, (dubbed "Hancock's Half-Hour") convey no genuine information that give any comfort, or assurance that they really know what they are doing.

Indeed, it would not be unfair to say that, at present, the govt. are giving the clear impression that they are in office, but not in power.

This should not surprise us; after all, human beings are fallible.   We carry on with our daily lives quite merrily until something out of the ordinary happens,  and then we see just how ill-equipped we are to deal with such matters.

Have we ever felt, at times, as if we are being swept along by events, like being caught in a fast-flowing river and helpless to turn round? At times like that our only comfort is to know that there is One who is both in office and in power.  That is, of course, the Lord Jesus Christ.  

In Hebrews 1 v 3 we read that He upholds all things by "the word of His power".  He is in absolute control - governments come and go, so do Prime Ministers and Presidents, BUT the Lord Jesus is the same "yesterday, today and forever" - Hebrews 13 v 8.

If we are tempted to put our trust in the latest eagerly awaited press conference, or some official govt. announcement, then we will be disappointed time and again.  As the Bible says "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we will remember the name of the Lord our God" - Psalm 20 v 7.  Moreover, Psalm 118 v 8 exhorts us to trust in the Lord rather than "to put confidence in man".

As the country continues to reel from one crisis to another, (and the worst is yet to come) let us not despair, as many around us are doing, but have complete confidence in the sovereignty of God; He knows what He is doing and will perform all His good intentions to the glory of His name and the good of everyone He has been pleased to call unto salvation (Romans 8 v 28).